Activision Blizzard pays 18 million dollar settlement in sexual harassment suit

Avatar image for sweep
sweep

10887

Forum Posts

3660

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 14

#1  Edited By sweep  Moderator

$18 million dollars that's million bucks.

Source

The skinny:

EEOC spokeswoman Nicole St Germain said the agency was pleased that Fischer said she would approve the settlement. She said that in addition to the payout, the deal requires Activision to take steps to prevent and address discrimination, harassment and retaliation.

In a 2021 complaint, the EEOC had accused Activision of failing to take corrective and preventive measures on sexual harassment complaints, discriminating against women in pay and promotions, and discriminating against pregnant workers. Activision denied violating anti-bias laws, but has said it will make changes to how it addresses workplace complaints.

Worth noting this is only one of several ongoing lawsuits revolving around sexual harassment cases at Activision Blizzard.

It's unfortunate that it took a lawsuit to get us here, but I imagine/hope developers will pay much more attention to how this shit is handled moving forward, out of financial paranoia if nothing else.

Avatar image for brian_
brian_

1303

Forum Posts

12560

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#2  Edited By brian_  Online

Damn... What's that? Like, a tenth of the cost of making a COD game? That'll teach 'em.

Avatar image for nuttism
Nuttism

231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@brian_: Companies like this work to maximize their gains. If it costs much less that 1/10 of a CoD budget to implement changes in their policy, then they probably will. Keep in mind that this is not the only suit on the table.

I am definitely not saying that all is fine or dandy or that whatever changes they implement will be very effective (a lot of harassment is down to workplace culture more than anything else, which seems pretty rotten in Activision's case) just that money that might seem like small change to large companies is still loss that they would rather be without.

Avatar image for facelessvixen
FacelessVixen

4009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

That's not enough.

Avatar image for brian_
brian_

1303

Forum Posts

12560

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#5  Edited By brian_  Online

@nuttism: For any truly meaningful change to happen their, you need more than policy. You need leadership that cares about the policy. Leadership that shouldn't need policy to do the right thing in the first place. When management is leading the company to billions of dollars, they aren't going to risk changing any of it for a few million. That is maximizing gains.

Avatar image for bladeofcreation
BladeOfCreation

2492

Forum Posts

27

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

Good for the victims, but it should be more. This amount of money equates to what? A week's worth of WoW subscriptions?

Avatar image for nameredacted
NameRedacted

612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Here's your daily reminder that "justice" and the law doesn't exist / apply to corporations and the 1%.

$18 million... that's it?! That's a misc. line item on a budget for "cost of doing business," not unlike the repeat corporate offenders who simply pay the fines rather than change their policies, and continue doing business as usual.

Bobby & the Board spend more than that a month on Hookers & Cocaine.

And here comes Microsoft with their Golden Parachute payouts... What an absolute joke.

Avatar image for av_gamer
AV_Gamer

2934

Forum Posts

17819

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 13

Most victims likely never would have seen that kind of money in their lifetime, so good for them. But for a major company like Blizzard, that 18 million is more like them playing 18 hundred in compensation. And they will easily make that money back.

Avatar image for undeadpool
Undeadpool

8427

Forum Posts

10761

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 18

Some layoffs should make up the difference nicely.

I dunno why they even pay PR, they've got an entire army of people on social media willing to stick up for them and silence dissent for free.

Avatar image for humanity
Humanity

21858

Forum Posts

5738

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 16

For a single victim $18 million would be a pretty good settlement. For the entire EEOC who I assume will split this money among the plaintiffs ehh not so much.

Avatar image for brian_
brian_

1303

Forum Posts

12560

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#11  Edited By brian_  Online

@humanity: According to Kotaku reporting, if they split it evenly amongst each claimant, everyone's looking at a cool $450. Sweet. Everyone go out and get new Xboxes! But get a S. You don't have enough for an X.

Avatar image for panfoot
Panfoot

673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Barely a slap on the wrist.

Avatar image for tartyron
tartyron

799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

And people wonder why an a doomer and a communist.

Avatar image for mrgreenman
MrGreenMan

452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

what a surprise.... Not unexpected but more disappointed.

Avatar image for arjailer
Arjailer

229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By Arjailer

$18,000,000 divided by $450 would mean 40,000 claimants, which is about 4 times as many employees as Activision has.

Not trying to say the payout is particularly great, just that the maths that came up with $450 per claimant may be suspect.

Avatar image for brian_
brian_

1303

Forum Posts

12560

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#16 brian_  Online

@arjailer: Not all of that $18 million is going to the claimants. Part of it is being used to pay for Activision/Blizzard to establish the harassment programs the company should have had in the first place. I'm assuming the $450 per person estimate comes from what's leftover once everybody else takes their cut of it.

Avatar image for therealturk
TheRealTurk

1413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@arjailer said:

$18,000,000 divided by $450 would mean 40,000 claimants, which is about 4 times as many employees as Activision has.

Not trying to say the payout is particularly great, just that the maths that came up with $450 per claimant may be suspect.

Yeah, I don't know how Kotaku is reaching that number. It sounds like more than a little bit of clown math.

The whole point of the claims process in the settlement is that no one really knows the exact number of claimants yet. If you read the decree, it contains a release of claims agreement where the dollar value is blank so it can be filled in later.

Avatar image for arjailer
Arjailer

229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18  Edited By Arjailer

@brian_: If you take half of Activision's employees as claimants (which is probably way too high) then 5,000 x $450 is $2.25 million (which sounds pretty pitiful)

But those should be some damn good harassment programs they're putting in place for the remaining $15.75 million.

Avatar image for brian_
brian_

1303

Forum Posts

12560

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#19 brian_  Online

Kotaku references a letter from the Communications Workers of America union that's working with the claimants for that $450 number, but looking at the actual letter, the only place I see that $450 number come up is in what was budgeted for each claimant's legal fees to hire someone to look over the settlement. So someone probably misread something.